This is better than any TV I’ve seen in years. Live Broadcast | Red Bull Stratos bit.ly/PjdpRy
Tag Archives: Twitter
What if money was no object? http://t.co/ofAPzJm3
What if money was no object? buff.ly/QRtrix
Job Title of the day… http://t.co/oFNrjlnR
Job Title of the day… buff.ly/OP32VH
Matt cartoons witty political cartoons and satiric…
Matt cartoons witty political cartoons and satirical sketches – Telegraph
Found at buff.ly/RSSIeJ http://t.co/Tq9xSNIX
@cozalive :-)
@cozalive 🙂
Can’t remember the last time I read Newsweek. “New…
Can’t remember the last time I read Newsweek.
“Newsweek magazine ends print edition to go online-only” buff.ly/R29CVi
@jortpossel Fantastic news. Good luck!
@jortpossel Fantastic news. Good luck!
Why Twitter is like Word…
Steve Gillmor is obsessed with Twitter an especially Track a specific function within Twitter that allows you to vanity search the service in real-time. Gillmor runs the wonderful Gillmor Gang podcast and every episode includes a plug for Twitter and specially a complaint about the Track functionality not being available.
All this reminds me of Word in the early 90s.
In the early 90s there was a long running functionality fight between the various word processor applications. Every few months a new version would appear with yet more functions. Every few months the magazines would run articles comparing the different packages and tell their readers which to buy.
During this period Word would often be labeled as incomplete, and missing key features. What was it missing? Word Count! Every few months, Word would be reviewed and it still wasn’t ready. Microsoft even produced a Macro to display a Word Count but the journalists just called that a fudge and not integrated.
In the end, Microsoft produced a Word Count with added extras, readability scores and such. Journalists happy; Microsoft went on to world domination.
Why is this like Twitter?
Well the Track function is fantastic is you’re Steve Gillmor, it’s what he wants. In fact, it’s also why Scoble likes FriendFeed I believe. However, they’re of no use to 95% of the users who just want to talk to friends and family.
What we’re seeing is journalists push applications developers into helping journalists and not the majority of their users.
Want another example? Who on earth needs over 2000 followers in Twitter or Facebook? Outside the world of PR and journalism it makes no sense. Let the complaints begin.
I heard about it on Twitter…
Years ago at dinner parties people used to discuss where they were when they learnt about X or Y. In years to come I can imagine everyone just replying “oh, on twitter”. We Read Twitter So You Don’t Have To: NASA finds water on Mars, Web 2.0 credits Twitter