Life’s a pig when…

…you’re working on a blog that revolves around people doing technical jobs and the job gets technical.

Surely Google is aiming their product at the webapp-coding world; apparently they’re aiming for my Grandmother…

“By page three, McCloud has lost the entire non-webapp-coding world. “The Gears guys were saying that one of the problems with browsers is they’re inherently single-threaded.” The majority of misfortunates who try to read this comic on Tuesday will have no idea who the Gears guys are. They’ll puzzle at the statement browsers inherently frimble frotz foobar. The rest of the 38-page book reads like the middle of a Neal Stephenson novel. Did you know that taking screenshots and creating a cryptographic hash is an imprecise way to compare layouts? It’s true.”

Google Chrome: Google’s browser comic kind of sucks

What this is really about…

Chrome will get heaps loads of praise or complaints about two things.

  • What it looks like; for this read the color of the buttons. This is because the people commenting, confuse User Interface Design with colors. A bit like confusing how well a car drives with the color or the controls.
  • How fast GMail loads. Mainly because the people doing the reviewing spend massive amounts of their time in email.

There is however more to this…

“To Google, the browser has become a weak link in the cloud system – the needle’s eye through which the outputs of the company’s massive data centers usually have to pass to reach the user – and as a result the browser has to be rethought, revamped, retooled, modernized. Google can’t wait for Microsoft or Apple or the Mozilla Foundation to make the changes (the first has mixed feelings about promoting cloud apps, the second is more interested in hardware than in clouds, and the third, despite regular infusions of Google bucks, lacks resources), so Google is jump-starting the process with Chrome.”

Rough Type: Nicholas Carr’s Blog: The cloud’s Chrome lining

Explaining your design…

I’m often amazed by the number of people I cross who can’t explain what they’re working on. Often after years of dedicated work they’re still defining themselves as “a mix of X and Y” or by what they’re not.

It’s very geeky but I do like this; how do you explain how your new software will work? As a comic.

Google on Google Chrome – comic book

It’s not perfect but they’ve hit on something here.

Hugh MacLeod asks for commissions…

Hugh is asking for commissions…

“I’m going to be hanging out my shingle more in the cartooning department. I think it’s time.”

gapingvoid: “cartoons drawn on the back of business cards”: gapingvoid commissions

Anyone who has read this and this will know that think that Hugh’s work is fantastic and worth every cent.

I’ll add the final part to the story to the blog over the weekend.

Knowing your worst nightmare…

“My nightmare: I’m piloting a spaceship over the surface of the Empire’s Death Cube, which is folding randomly because of a warp in space-time, and my only hope is to fly to the left and insert the trapezoidal nose of my ship into the trapezoidal hole of the Death Cube’s energy portal. And then I look out my window and see that the Cube is made out of seafood.”

Joho the Blog » I am up-down dyslexic

$100 of value…

For $100 you can buy CDs that contain all the National Geographic magazines since they started over 100 years ago. Basically, they make a fantastic present. Why do I know? I have one.

Now you’d imagine that they have a pretty slick operation around this so that I can keep my software up to date. And even subscribe to updates.

Well think again. From the support web site…

Updates and Replacements
There have been four previous iterations of the National Geographic Complete package (108 Years, 109 Years, 110 Years and 111 Years), and each was released by different companies. All are incompatible with each other and act as stand-alone products. Some were 16-bit (and thus incompatible with our current 32-bit version), others were just constructed differently by the companies contracted to produce them over the past few years.

Unfortunately the only solution for this is to purchase National Geographic: 10 Legendary Years. This will bring any version you own up to the year 2000. However, this too will be a stand-alone program (the 10 Legendary Years). It will not be accessible via your older National Geographic program.

So for example if you have the National Geographic 108 Years—it ends at 1996. For any years up to 1996 you could use your original program, but to view the years 1997-2000 you would need to open the 10 Legendary Years program separately. And yes, since the 10 Legendary Years product also includes the years 1990-1996 there will be some overlap.

The only way to have a complete and fully integrated product is to purchase the current full set, National Geographic 112 Years. We apologize for any inconvenience.

National Geographic Magazine CD-ROMs: Technical Support, Help

Recommend a product that you’ve never tasted?

A few weeks ago I found myself in California and talking to Eileen Hassi who part owns Ritual Roasters in San Francisco. The conversation started with the normal “what do you do?” and then she blew me away.

She had the perfect one line response, which led to my second question, to which she had another perfect response; and on and on. After a half day spent in her company not once was I left with the impression that she was less than 100% committed. Her commitment and obsession with her product seemed total.

I’ve rarely been so impressed by someone. And this is a three store coffee chain!

So I finally got around to looking her up on Google tonight and this is the quote I see…

Ms. Hassi said she was at a party recently when someone came up to her and offered a profusion of thanks. “He said, ‘thank you, thank you, thank you for opening your cafe.’ “

Street Scene – Cafe Capitalism, San Francisco Style – NYTimes.com

Can I recommend a coffee house without ever seeing it? Hell yes!

Random thoughts…