Monthly Archives: December 2008
Stopped by its own weight…
If there is one thing that I hate; its being told that something is inevitable…
“I first encountered the Chicago theory in law school. The Chicagoists somehow read into law a market efficiency component that was never there. I recoiled against it — not because of the libertarianism, which I embraced. Rather, it seemed a backdoor way to circumvent democracy, and force into the legal system rules that were never debated, voted on, or agreed to by a representative government. I found the extremist legal theories of Judges like Richard Posner and Frank Easterbrook intellectually repulsive. They were undemocratic, anti-representative government. When I told a professor that the law and economics movement was an attempt at a political coup, he laughed and said, try to stop it.”
RIP Chicago School of Economics: 1976-2008 | The Big Picture
Wow…
Why can’t they produce something like this themselves…
Poor Iceland…
…they come out lower than Zimbabwe…
Er, no…
“I was thinking about the three-year rule while reading about Malcolm Gladwell’s observation that it takes 10,000 hours to become truly expert at something. If you really throw yourself into a job, you’ll spend 60 hours a week working. That’s 3,000 hours a year (allowing for vacation), which means you’ll hit the 10,000 hour mark a few months after your third year.
So maybe that’s where the three-year rule comes from. You’re now expert at what you set out to master. Great. Now go do something else.”
When I read the book I thought that the idea behind the 10,000 hours was to get good at something and then use that knowledge. What The Economist and the media in general seems to favor is getting good at something and then doing something else.
The other version of this is that you learn a foreign language, say Italian, but then only travel to Spanish speaking countries. Or you learn a new instrument ever three years but never perform.
I think that this explains something that we all know deep down. Whenever we read an article about a subject that we know well we believe that the article is wrong. However, we believe articles about subjects that we don’t know.
This could be fun…
Fighting Liberals: Old Shoes- UPDATE
I can imagine the lorry loads of shoes arriving each morning.
This brings tears to my eyes…
Wonderful, just wonderful!
I wonder where mine is. I’d love to know where my donated OLPC went and who is using it.
Traditions…
“It seems so ugly, the way this has gone down — but there’s no way to break with tradition in a nice way.”
Oh, how true!
Please install these in Paris…
Le Whinger…
Comments by Thomas Crampton…
“From his comments about the Sauna set up outside the conference, Carr shows his true European colors:
I found [the sauna] packed to its pine rafters with Brits, getting slowly drunk on licorice vodka and gleefully bitching about how disappointing everything was.
This gleeful bitching and cynicism by Carr and his fellow Europeans may have something to do with the difficulty Europeans have in getting things done.”
To be honest; I think that Thomas is being generous.
I think a large part of this is jealousy, and not jealousy of Loïc but of the sucess of Le Web.
In 2006 a lot of the British commenators who complained about Le Web said that next year they would organize a better conference in the UK. It must be said that those Whingers from 2006 have really shown Loïc up with their action and hard work.